Tag: brain stuff

My Orange Brain: Hemispheric Hegemon

My Orange Brain: Hemispheric Hegemon

Witzelsucht

If any of you have slogged through my previous book critiques, you know that I know how to analyze things. I can analyze something to death, then play devil’s advocate to reanimate it, then kill it again with a rejoinder. I can even analyze things that aren’t real, things I just make up in my mind.

For much of my life I’ve operated with only one operational brain hemisphere (the left one). And look where that got me! About the only time I used my right brain was to come up with jokes of varying quality. Mostly one-liners and puns. Unfortunately, rather than feeling relief that my right brain has at least one function, I might have cause to worry. This type of humor can be a sign of brain damage called Witzelsucht.

(Like I didn’t have enough problems to deal with. Now I’m turning German!

That was a joke. But it’s precisely that type of joke that proves I have more brain damage than I thought! 🙂 )

Orange Brain and Blue Brain

orange brain
An actual picture of Jonathan’s brain

This handy picture from The Brain Made Simple illustrates my plight nicely. (I’m using mindfulness to soothe my analytical irritation at the picture’s inverted presentation, with the left-brain on the right and the right-brain on the left.)

I’m good at Orange Brain stuff. Blue Brain stuff, not as much. And I’m right-handed, which makes me even orange-er. I’m not even Dutch! (See? I’m hopeless.)

Let’s run down the Orange List (I’m correcting the picture’s typos because I can’t help myself):

  • Analytic Thought: Duh.
  • Logic: See title of blog.
  • Language: I’ve already used the words “rejoinder” and “plight” and this article is only halfway through.
  • Reasoning: I can come up with reasons for why I do anything, even if they’re wrong.
  • Science/Math: I know the Pythagorean Theorem and all the planets in the solar system. Coincidence? I think not!
  • Writing: I’m writing right now; also, I know how to use a semi-colon.
  • Numbers Skills: I’m an accountant.
  • Right-hand control: I always use my right hand when I’m trying to control someone or something.

Now the Blue List:

  • Art Awareness: I was not aware awareness of art was something to be aware of before writing this article.
  • Creativity: Every word I write uses the same 26 letters. Hardly creative.
  • Imagination: Unless Excel has an imagination function I’m out of luck.
  • Intuition: I thought only women had this?
  • Insight: I wear glasses, so clearly my sight is lacking.
  • Holistic Thought: I didn’t know you could have thoughts with holes in them. I’m way behind on this one.
  • Music Awareness: Music is different than art? I wasn’t aware of that.
  • 3D Forms: Every time I’ve drawn a circle or square they’ve only been 2D. Every. Single. Time.
  • Left-Hand Control: Anyone who has seen me miss a putt on the golf course knows I lack left-hand control.

Blue Brain Life Support

Naturally, when I became aware of my atrophied right brain I just wanted to accept that it was broken and give up. But because I’m an enlightened man in recovery now, and because my brain is tuned to solve problems with analysis, logic, and reasoning, I am thinking about the right brain and ways to pump him up.

Early ideas include guitar, poetry, creative writing, and drawing/sketching. I have the tools to do all of these things, but sometimes have trouble doing them because I don’t feel the results are good enough. (A personal character defect is perfectionism.)

Of course, I could commit myself to posting X number of creative things on this blog, which would force me to do creative things. But that sounds dangerously close to a goal, which is scary. (A personal character defect is a fear of failure.)

As with…hold on. Someone’s talking to me.

OK, I just heard from my dad, literally in the middle of typing this article. He mentioned to me a tool called a Mind Map. I’d heard of these but never used them, because they don’t follow my favorite format (a spreadsheet) and because they look suspiciously like drawing, a creative Blue Brain activity.

When you’re writing an article about your creative dearth and you get interrupted with an idea to improve creativity, it’s probably God trying to tell me something. Message received!

Mind mapping, poetry, creative writing, guitar, drawing. I just need to pick one and do it (procrastination and slow decision-making are personal character defects).

Here’s a start at least: my own personal Jackson Pollock-style painting, courtesy of an online Pollock simulator. The great thing about abstract art is that there is no standard for what “good” is, so my analytical Orange Brain can’t rate its merit. It’s the artistic equivalent of trying to divide by zero.

LOL, take that Orange Brain!

painting
Dividing by Zero by Jonathan Lemon
The Monty Hall Problem

The Monty Hall Problem

Sometimes I think so much that I run out of my own thoughts. It’s rare, but it happens.

My brain doesn’t idle well, so I fill it with books and articles. Monty Hall and probability reviews have provided my brain with enough thought material for days.

The Monty Hall Problem

The Monty Hall Problem is the most famous problem in probability. That makes it about as well-known as the capital of Nebraska (it’s not Nebraska City…I know, I was surprised, too).

goat
Nothing personal, Mr. Goat. I’d rather have a car.

The problem gets its name from Monty Hall, host of the classic game show Let’s Make a Deal. You’re faced with 3 doors. Behind one door is a new car. A goat is behind the other two doors. You pick one of the 3 doors. (For purposes of this problem, assume you win if you pick the car and not a goat.)

After you pick a door, Monty Hall opens one of the other two doors to reveal a goat. Two doors remain. He asks you if you want to switch your choice from your original pick to the remaining door.

The question is, should you switch?

Double Your Fun

I first encountered this problem and thought it didn’t matter if you switched. The probability was the same at 50%, as two doors remained. Most people think similarly.

Most people are wrong. Switching increases your odds of success (again, assuming you are not a goat enthusiast) from 1/3 to 2/3. What??

Let’s take it from the top. When we start, there are 3 unopened doors, one prize, and two decoys. We make our choice, and our odds of winning are 1/3. So far, so good.

It’s when a decoy door is opened and we’re offered the chance to switch that probability cuts across our natural intuition. It’s easy to be fooled into thinking because two doors remain, probability is 1/2.

Understanding why switching is better is a bit clearer if we change the order order of things slightly. You make your pick. Now suppose that instead of opening a door, the host offers you a chance to switch and take the other two doors. Obviously that’s a good deal, two doors are better than one.

Well, that’s basically what the host is offering you: a chance to take two doors. It’s just that one of them happens to be opened already, and there was a goat behind it. But even if the door wasn’t opened, and you could switch to two unopened doors instead of switching to one unopened and one opened…there was always a goat behind one of those doors anyway.

The host always opens the door with the goat. So in effect, there is no difference between the scenarios. And switching doubles your odds.

Brain Drain

If you’re still not seeing the logic, I don’t blame you. This video does a better job of explaining it than I do.

I’m going to sign out of this article before I overthink it and get confused again. But I have one more thought before I go: the brain fascinates me. Especially because there are so many blind spots in its mechanics. As a monkey mind zookeeper, knowledge of these blind spots is useful. It helps me monitor the monkey’s tricks so he doesn’t start breaking things again.

And it reminds me that I’m not alone. Anyone with a brain can be fooled. It’s a hardware issue!